ABSTRACT
Case Report: A 28 year old male with a past medical history of hypothyroidism and positive ANA presented to an outpatient dermatology clinic with a diffuse pruritic rash two weeks after the administration of his first Moderna COVID booster vaccine. He denied any other accompanying symptoms such as fever or chills as well as any similar rashes to prior doses of the Moderna COVID vaccine. The rash consisted of pink erythematous minimally scaly papules, thin plaques and patches involving the left and right dorsal hands, forearms, wrists, face, neck and left shoulder. The remainder of the patient's skin including the bilateral lower extremities, the eyelids, conjunctiva and oral mucosa was clear. The patient denied any similar rashes in the past. The patient denied any allergies to medications, or food or environmental allergies. He denied any notable contact allergen exposures, including to soaps, lotions, and cosmetic products. The patient also denied any significant family history or past surgical history. The patient was on Armour Thyroid for hypothyroidism and testosterone for low levels since age eighteen. The patient was started on cetirizine 10 mg once daily for the rash with minimal improvement. Autoimmune workup for the rash was notable for an elevated anti-RNP and as the patient's past medical history included Raynaud's phenomenon and ANA positivity for ten years, the patient was diagnosed with mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). Autoimmune conditions can often have an indolent course, where symptoms progressively develop and worsen. MCTD is an autoimmune overlap syndrome that can consist of the following three connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, and polymyositis. Millions of individuals across the world are receiving COVID vaccines to protect themselves and members of their community, and it is of utmost importance that we continue to investigate adverse events. Although of low incidence, these rare effects have the ability to impact large numbers of people within both healthy and immunocompromised populations. It is critical that we examine and document them in a rigorous manner, to ensure safe vaccine delivery and reassure the public about vaccine safety overall.
ABSTRACT
A 51-year-old woman presented to our service with a 2-year history of severely painful, thickened skin of her bilateral hands and feet. She advised of considerable skin pain on mobilizing. She intermittently applied acrylate nails. This was on a background of chronic urticaria, asthma and allergic rhinitis. She described a positive family history of psoriasis. On examination, there was marked hyperkeratosis with welldemarcated erythema on the central palms and entire fingers with deep fissuring and scale. Similar finding were noted on the soles of the feet particularly affecting the heels, arch and also the tips of the toes. The morphology of the lesions favoured psoriasis, but the differential diagnosis included chronic hand dermatitis. She was referred for topical psoralen + ultraviolet A (PUVA) and patch testing to standard battery and acrylates. Treatment with topical PUVA was discontinued and patch testing lists were cancelled as a result of the emergence of COVID-19 in Ireland. Topical therapy of clobetasol propionate was initiated. On follow-up review, the appearances of her feet and hands had deteriorated significantly. She was commenced on acitretin 10 mg once daily, which was escalated to 20 mg 2 months later. Clinical improvement was noted, but appearances deteriorated once again following the application of acrylic nails. Further history revealed the patient had assisted with the application of acrylic nails to clients years prior to her initial review. Patch testing took place 18 months after initial review due to outpatient list cancellations secondary to the COVID-19 pandemic. Upon review 48 h after the application of the (METH) Acrylate Series, the patient was found to have a +2 reaction to 2- hydroxyethyl methacrylate and a further +2 reaction to 2- Hydroxypropyl methacrylate. At her 96-h review, both reaction sites were marked at +1. Following complete avoidance of acrylates, the palmoplantar inflammation entirely resolved. This case highlights the importance of a detailed clinical history where contact dermatitis is considered. In our patient's case, the clinical history and examination of the palmoplantar eruption combined with the first-degree family history of psoriasis were highly suggestive of a diagnosis of psoriasis. The episodic severe flares and its refractory nature to treatment raised suspicion for allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatologists should remain alert for potential contact allergens in cases of severe palmoplantar psoriasis. A further area for consideration is the deleterious effect the COVID-19 pandemic had on the successful diagnosis and treatment of dermatological patients through the cancellation of outpatient services.
ABSTRACT
Rationale: Men who have sex with men have different contact allergen exposures compared to men who have sex with women due to cultural differences in the LGBTQ+ community. Poppers, a common name for volatile alkyl nitrates, are used more frequently in the MSM community as recreational inhalants. We aimed to identify common anatomic sites and contact allergens associated with popper's dermatitis in the MSM community. Method(s): Covidence, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched to identify relevant articles studying allergic contact dermatitis associated with poppers in the MSM population. Search terms included 'allergic' or 'contact dermatitis' or 'patch testing' or "poppers" or 'Men who have sex with men'. Date, geographical or language restrictions were not used. No exclusion criteria was used. Result(s): : Common allergens associated with popper's dermatitis in the MSM community included amyl nitrate (N=7), isobutyl nitrate (N=3), isopropyl nitrate (N=2), and fragrance mix (N=5). Common anatomic sites included perioral regions (N=3), chest (N=2), nasal orifices (N=3), cheeks (N=5), penis (N=1), and lateral thigh (N=1). Conclusion(s): Sexual orientation is a relevant factor for dermatologists/allergists to consider, as the standard patch test series does not include common allergens associated with popper's dermatitis which disproportionally affects the MSM community. Our community needs to include gender and sexuality demographics when collecting patch test data.Copyright © 2022